America’s Cup environmental review draws criticism

07/25/2011
By Alex Zielinski

A glimpse of things to come? A crowded day on San Francisco Bay in February 2010. Photo courtesy of Mr. Littlehand on Flickr.

Heavy construction. Massive crowds. Congested waterways. Based on the city’s recently released draft environment impact report (EIR) for the 2013 America’s Cup, these threats, along with others, are an unavoidable addition to the international event.

Local environmental groups are split over the city’s proposed plans to tackle the problems.

“I’m optimistic about the report,” said Deb Self, director of the San Francisco Baykeeper. “While we haven’t seen all of the details we’ve suggested yet, it’s headed in the right direction.”

The Baykeeper, one of 30 environment organizations assisting the city in forming the EIR, is focusing on assessing the event’s potential impact on water quality and the shoreline.

With more infrequent boaters heading out to watch the race, Self is concerned about improper waste disposal and boat cleanliness. In addition, Bay Area boat yards, already known for their polluting methods, will need to prepare for a large increase in business.

“The boat yards are already disposing zinc and copper into the water,” said Self. “This influx of boats will only exacerbate the issue.”

Nonetheless, Self said she believes the city will work hard to incorporate the Baykeeper’s considerations. Aside from pollution control, Self is also involved in environmental education during the event.

“This is a tremendous opportunity to highlight the bay ecosystem on a local and national scale,” said Self, who is working with the race organizers to create TV segment focused on the Bay Area’s natural assets.

But not all environmental groups are as enthusiastic about the EIR as Self.

“The draft falls short in many ways,” said Mike Lynes, conservation director** of the Golden Gate Audubon Society. “Like most EIRs, the city failed to consider the long-term impacts of this event, especially in such a sensitive area.”

The bay shoreline and wetlands are home to a variety of threatened bird species, including the snowy plover and brown pelican; other species are on the verge of endangerment.

According to the EIR, many of the current shoreline areas home to at-risk species have inadequate fencing and signage. The draft stressed that these prohibitory items would be reinforced for the event, along with an installation of surveillance cameras.

“Ninety percent of the wetlands are already gone. Fences and monitors are not enough,” said Lynes. “They need someone out there guarding the area, not just watching it be trampled.”

Lynes is also dissatisfied by the EIR’s take on open water habitat protection. The draft suggests a “mariner education program” that will inform the boaters of the sensitive areas in the bay, which is a part of the Pacific Flyway.

“Their responsibility is more than just a pamphlet,” said Lynes. “They either need concrete mitigation, keeping all boats out of the areas, or need to look into creating bird refuges during the event.”

While Audubon plans on submitting a formal letter to the city, Lynes is unsure about its actual impact.

“I have a sense that the board of supervisors doesn’t have a high bar set for this project, even though they have the money and expertise to do it right,” Lynes said. “This is part of the cost of hosting the event.”

The public hearing on the draft EIR will be held at the Planning Commission in Room 400, City Hall, on August 11, 2011, at noon. Public comments on the EIR will be accepted until 5:00 PM on August 25, 2011. More information at the Planning Department’s website.

**CORRECTION: This article originally reported that Mike Lynes was the director of the Golden Gate Audubon Society. He is the conservation director, while Mark Welther is the group’s executive director.

Tags: , audubon, baykeeper, draft eir,

Comments are closed.

Featured Video

"It's gettin' real in the Whole Foods parking lot" by Smog and Fog Films.

Follow Us!

Recent Comments

Jerry: The statement that the SF Public Utilities Commission is developing local w...
Tree Removal Brisbane: We all love trees!...
Howard Wong: The high risk to the City's finances is a real concern---because the Federa...
MROSD: Thank you for taking an interest in the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space Di...
Mark: If we're financially responsible for the trees fronting our property, I sur...
Anon: So they didn't consider to include non-business owners? What gives?...
Ultra-Humanite: I believe it's called survival of the fittest for a reason....
Mark: Just leave mother nature alone and if that means the demise of the spotted ...
Michelle Burke: If property owners are fined $500 per tree because they failed to give near...
Chris: Reduce City workers benefits to reasonable standards and the City will sudd...

Field Notes Blog

Report: San Francisco faces water-related dangers

San Francisco  has been identified as one of the most vulnerable cities in the nation when it comes to water-related impacts of climate change....
Read more »

Builders cheer demise of California environmental law

Upon attending the West Coast Green events at the Moscone Center in San Francisco this week, I was thrilled to find out that Governor...
Read more »

Recycling carpets in California will save landfill space

Of the myriad of things cramming California landfills, discarded carpets are taking up lots of space. About 400 million pounds are tossed each year,...
Read more »

Got News?

Send story tips or news items for The Daily Catch:

[email protected]

We want to hear from you!

Who we are

Way Out West is a news site for the Bay Area dedicated to daily coverage of local green news.

We're camping out at public meetings, traipsing through parks, and sticking our noses into green tech research to bring you relevant local stories that matter.

WOW is produced by two local environmental journalists for you, our eco-savvy readers. We'd love to hear what you want from this site.